Risk management of quantitative trading systems based on the 4M1E framework and the Analytic Hierarchy Process

Sijie Meng; Xiaofei Chen; Xiaolong Li

doi:10.54254/2977-5701/2025.31077

Article Information

Received: 4 December 2025

Published: 30 December 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-5701/2025.31077

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Meng,S.;Chen,X.;Li,X. (2025). Risk management of quantitative trading systems based on the 4M1E framework and the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,18(11),135-141.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Journal

Journal: Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies

Volume: Vol.18, Issue 11

ISSN: 2977-5701 (Print) / 2977-571X (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. (2022). CAICT releases the top ten trends in the information and communications technology (ICT) industry.Internet World, (1), 5.

[2]Wang, X., & Yang, H. (2024). Challenges and policy approaches in building a new digital trade system.Open Herald, (4), 19–26.

[3]Wang, X., & Yin, S. (2021). Research on quantitative investment strategy based on random forest model and risk management. In Proceedings of the 2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer-Aided Education (pp. 2126–2131).

[4]Nabipour, M., Najafi, H. A., Barzegari, S., et al. (2020). Predicting stock market trends using machine learning and deep learning algorithms via continuous and binary data: A comparative analysis.IEEE Access, 8, 150199–150212.

[5]Fister, D., Fister, I., & Fister, I. (2019). Deep learning for stock market trading: A superior trading strategy?Neural Network World, 29(3), 151–171.

[6]Zhu, Q. (2024). Design of a quantitative futures trading system based on CEP technology.China New Technologies and Products, (8), 135–138.

[7]Shen, J. (2021). Nine challenges in modern algorithmic trading and controls. arXiv.

[8]Taherdoost, H. (2021). A review on risk management in information systems: Risk policy, control, and fraud detection.Electronics, 10(24), Article 3065.

[9]Simon, P., & Hillson, D. (2012). Practical risk management: The ATOM methodology.Management Concepts, (2), 5–8.

[10]Addy, W. A., Ajayi-Nifise, A. O., Bello, B. G., et al. (2024). Machine learning in financial markets: A critical review of algorithmic trading and risk management.International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 1853–1862.

[11]Min, B. H., & Borch, C. (2022). Systemic failures and organizational risk management in algorithmic trading: Normal accidents and high reliability in financial markets.Social Studies of Science, 52(2), 277–302.

[12]Păuna, C. (2018). Capital and risk management for automated trading systems. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Informatics in Economy (pp. 183–188).

[13]Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Artificial intelligence, machine learning and big data in finance. OECD Publishing.