About JAEPSJournal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) is an open-access, peer-reviewed monthly academic journal hosted by the Peking University Research Centre for Market Economy (RCME) and published by EWA Publishing. Centered on real-world economic practice, the journal integrates three core research dimensions: practical application of economic theories, measurable economic output of empirical research, and evidence-backed policy formulation value of rigorous academic outputs. Beyond economic and decision-making value, it highlights industrial empowerment, standardized governance, cross-border exchange and demonstration promotion value of economic research; these multi-layered research values are delivered to university economics researchers, government economic policymakers, enterprise industrial consultants and financial analysts via standardized quantitative research paradigms, industrial decision references and cross-border academic communication channels.For more details of the JAEPS scope, please refer to the Aim&Scope page. For more information about the journal, please refer to the FAQ page or contact info@ewapublishing.org. |
| Aims & scope of JAEPS are: ·Economics ·Management ·Finance & Accounting ·Interdisciplinary Fields |
Article processing charge
A one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) of 450 USD (US Dollars) applies to papers accepted after peer review. excluding taxes.
Open access policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. (CC BY 4.0 license).
Your rights
These licenses afford authors copyright while enabling the public to reuse and adapt the content.
Peer-review process
Our blind and multi-reviewer process ensures that all articles are rigorously evaluated based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the field.
Editors View full editorial board
Beijing, China
xqin@pku.edu.cn
London, UK
canh.dang@kcl.ac.uk
Edinburgh, UK
B.Adamolekun@napier.ac.uk
Macau, China
qiangli@cityu.edu.mo
Latest articles View all articles
Mountain tourism allows visitors to experience landscapes that are distant from cities, yet the waste left around these landscapes may remain long after the visitors leave. This investigation examines a youth trash sweep conducted near Muztagh Ata in the beginning of August, 2026. It combines direct observation of the waste, its location, and the surrounding land use with academic studies and official waste-management guidance. Moreover, most visible items were consumer waste, especially beverage bottles and food packaging, while a smaller but noticeable group consisted of construction-related materials connected to a hotel being prepared nearby. Much of the waste was found away from the road and trapped in wet, muddy grass closer to the mountain. Its distribution suggests that wind had moved at least part of the lighter waste from the road and visitor stopping area, although the original source of each item could not be confirmed. The evidence indicates that travelers and passing visitors were probably the largest source, while nearby construction also contributed part of the waste. The trash sweep improved the site immediately, but it did not prevent new litter from entering the same area. Long-term improvement therefore depends on source reduction, clearer visitor responsibility, regular collection, and cooperation among scenic-area managers, construction operators, local communities, and volunteers.
This paper examines whether China's green finance reform pilot zones improve environmental performance and how such effects are transmitted. The 2017 pilot-zone policy provides a quasi-natural experimental setting for the analysis. Observations covering 2013–2021 are examined through a Difference-in-Differences (DID) approach. The estimation result shows an improvement in environmental performance after the green finance pilot zones were introduced. This effect is regionally heterogeneous, with a stronger influence in eastern China than in western China. A mediation model further indicates that the policy effect is an important channel: green finance influences market behavior and thereby contributes to environmental improvement. These results provide evidence for policymakers seeking to use green finance as a tool for environmental governance.
With the continued development of direct financing, both the market environment and customers' financial awareness have matured. Traditional credit business is no longer the core financing need of large enterprises; increasingly, customers expect banks to provide comprehensive financial services such as restructuring, mergers and acquisitions, and corporate finance. A key challenge for banks is therefore how to remain the primary provider of financial services and products for major clients amid the impact of direct financing. To meet this challenge, banks must use investment banking to advance the transformation from corporate credit to corporate finance and from a credit-oriented bank to a comprehensive financial services provider. Emerging high-value-added businesses led by investment banking not only generate direct returns but also support other businesses, create synergies with commercial banking, and strengthen banks' core competitiveness. However, banking services are becoming increasingly homogenized. In China, for example, the four major state-owned banks, including the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), all conduct investment banking business, while large joint-stock banks such as China Merchants Bank and Industrial Bank have also entered the field, intensifying competition. To offer useful suggestions for ICBC's investment banking development strategy, this paper analyzes the current state of its investment banking business, draws on relevant domestic and international literature, and proposes reasonable solutions to existing problems. These findings offer both theoretical guidance and practical value for the development of ICBC's investment banking business.
Using panel data on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2022, this study examines the effects of environmental uncertainty and managerial myopia on corporate ESG performance and further investigates the moderating role of bank credit support. The findings show that both environmental uncertainty and managerial myopia have significant negative effects on corporate ESG performance. Moreover, bank credit support mitigates the adverse effects of environmental uncertainty and managerial myopia on corporate ESG performance. Heterogeneity analyses indicate that these negative effects are more pronounced among non-state-owned enterprises and firms in high-technology industries. By integrating environmental uncertainty and managerial short-term orientation, this study provides a unified framework for understanding how external operating conditions and managerial decision horizons jointly shape corporate ESG performance. It also highlights bank credit as a potential buffer against both external and internal short-term pressures. The findings have practical implications for promoting corporate sustainability and strengthening corporate governance.
Volumes View all volumes
2026
Volume 19September 2026
Find articlesVolume 19April 2026
Find articlesVolume 19March 2026
Find articles2025
Volume 18May 2025
Find articlesVolume 18September 2025
Find articlesVolume 18August 2025
Find articlesAnnouncements View all announcements
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
We pledge to our journal community:
We're committed: we put diversity and inclusion at the heart of our activities...
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) are solely those of the individual authors and contributors...
Indexing
The published articles will be submitted to following databases below: