About JAEPSJournal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) is an open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal hosted by Peking University Research Centre for Market Economy (RCME) and published by EWA Publishing. JAEPS is published monthly. JAEPS present latest theoretical and methodological discussions to bear on the scholarly works covering economics, management and finance & accounting, as well as multifaceted issues arising out of emerging concerns from different industries and debates surrounding latest policies. Situated at the forefront of the interdisciplinary fields of applied economics and policy studies, this journal seeks to bring together the scholarly insights centering on economics, and relevant subfields that trace to the discipline of management, finance & accounting, and interdisciplinary fields the aforementioned. JAEPS is dedicated to the gathering of intellectual views by scholars and policymakers. The articles included are relevant for scholars, policymakers, and students of economics, policy studies, and otherwise interdisciplinary programs.For more details of the JAEPS scope, please refer to the Aim&Scope page. For more information about the journal, please refer to the FAQ page or contact info@ewapublishing.org. |
| Aims & scope of JAEPS are: ·Economics ·Management ·Finance & Accounting ·Interdisciplinary Fields |
Article processing charge
A one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) of 450 USD (US Dollars) applies to papers accepted after peer review. excluding taxes.
Open access policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. (CC BY 4.0 license).
Your rights
These licenses afford authors copyright while enabling the public to reuse and adapt the content.
Peer-review process
Our blind and multi-reviewer process ensures that all articles are rigorously evaluated based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the field.
Editors View full editorial board
Beijing, China
xqin@pku.edu.cn
London, UK
canh.dang@kcl.ac.uk
Edinburgh, UK
B.Adamolekun@napier.ac.uk
Murcia, Spain
faura@um.es
Latest articles View all articles
Green finance is a pivotal market-oriented instrument for coordinating economic growth with ecological sustainability. Against the backdrop of China's Green Finance Reform and Innovation Pilot Zone (GFRIPZ) policy, this paper utilizes this policy implemented in 2017 as a quasi-natural experiment to investigate its impact on corporate environmental investment. Based on data from Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2011 to 2024, this study conducts an empirical test using the Difference-in-Differences (DID) model. The results indicate that the pilot policy significantly promotes corporate environmental investment. Mechanism analysis demonstrates that the policy drives investment through two main channels: first, by increasing government environmental subsidies to provide fiscal incentives; and second, by strengthening regional environmental regulation intensity to exert external pressure. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the promoting effect of the pilot policy on environmental investment is more pronounced for non-state-owned enterprises and non-heavily polluting firms. This paper provides empirical evidence for assessing the micro-level effectiveness of green finance policies and offers theoretical support for optimizing resource allocation and driving a comprehensive green economic transformation.
Based on my more than four years of work experience in the pharmaceutical industry, I once regarded "compliance" as an external constraint rather than a core competitiveness. In the era of short videos, numerous peers have released content that skirts regulatory rules to drive traffic and achieve considerable profits. This situation made me somewhat eager for quick success and instant benefits, as I was overly eager to achieve better results and more career development opportunities. Consequently, pharmaceutical supervision laws and regulations such as Decree No.24 once became a straitjacket that hindered me from creating outstanding and influential promotional content. Later, when contemplating entrepreneurship, I realized this issue—what was a constraint for me could also be an opportunity from another perspective. Upon reflection, the particularity of the pharmaceutical industry (e.g., the stringent restrictions on publicity stipulated in the Advertising Law and the Drug Administration Law) is precisely the cornerstone for building user trust. Some practitioners have resorted to edge-ball practices, leading to market chaos and a decline in consumer trust. During a business trip for market research last year, I found that traditional pharmaceutical marketing models (e.g., offline promotion) are experiencing diminishing efficiency. These models have failed to fully embrace the digital trend, resulting in the loss of early traffic dividends. The number of in-store purchasers has decreased, and more young people choose to buy pharmaceutical products through online food delivery platforms.
Against the backdrop of the deepening implementation of the rural revitalization strategy, the development of the rural market economy has become a central lever for activating endogenous rural growth dynamics. As a critical component of rural infrastructure construction, public transport capital investment exhibits a profound interactive relationship with the development of the rural market economy. Grounded in public goods theory, coupling coordination theory, and industrial integration theory, this study employs the entropy weight method, coupling degree model, and coupling coordination degree model, combined with provincial panel data from 2010 to 2020, to systematically examine the interactive mechanisms between public transport capital investment and rural market economy development. The findings indicate that public transport capital investment promotes rural market economy development through three primary channels: reducing circulation costs, facilitating industrial agglomeration, and expanding market boundaries. In turn, the development of the rural market economy guides the efficient allocation of public transport capital via demand-driven forces, financial feedback mechanisms, and structural optimization. The coupling coordination degree between the two systems shows a year-by-year upward trend; however, pronounced regional disparities persist. The central and western regions lag behind the eastern region in terms of coordination levels, and within rural areas there exist dual imbalances characterized by "transport lag–market contraction" and "transport advance–resource misallocation". Based on these findings, this paper proposes policy recommendations including optimizing the investment structure, strengthening supply–demand alignment, and improving coordination mechanisms, thereby providing a reference for promoting the synergistic development of rural public transport and the market economy.
In the digital transformation of enterprises, event logs are generated in large quantities, but mining process diagrams alone is insufficient to produce actionable value. This paper proposes the Diagnosis-Detection-Verification (DDV) framework, a novel process optimization methodology that bridges the gap between event logs and explainable interventions. The framework integrates three key components: (1) bottleneck diagnosis using criticality-indexed activity analysis, (2) hybrid anomaly detection combining rule-based filtering with Isolation Forest, and (3) data-driven intervention rule generation validated through log replay simulation. We demonstrate that DDV achieves state-of-the-art performance on BPI Challenge datasets (F1 = 0.82, + 5.1% improvement over Deep SVDD) while maintaining computational efficiency (26.5 × faster training than deep learning methods). Intervention rules generated by DDV reduce the average throughput time by 18.7% and improve SLA compliance from 67.3% to 82.6%.
Volumes View all volumes
Announcements View all announcements
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
We pledge to our journal community:
We're committed: we put diversity and inclusion at the heart of our activities...
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) are solely those of the individual authors and contributors...
Indexing
The published articles will be submitted to following databases below: