About JAEPSJournal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) is an open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal hosted by Peking University Research Centre for Market Economy (RCME) and published by EWA Publishing. JAEPS is published monthly. JAEPS present latest theoretical and methodological discussions to bear on the scholarly works covering economic theories, econometric analyses, as well as multifaceted issues arising out of emerging concerns from different industries and debates surrounding latest policies. Situated at the forefront of the interdisciplinary fields of applied economics and policy studies, this journal seeks to bring together the scholarly insights centering on economic development, infrastructure development, macroeconomic policy, governance of welfare policy, policies and governance of emerging markets, and relevant subfields that trace to the discipline of applied economics, public policy, policy studies, and combined fields of the aforementioned. JAEPS is dedicated to the gathering of intellectual views by scholars and policymakers. The articles included are relevant for scholars, policymakers, and students of economics, policy studies, and otherwise interdisciplinary programs.For more details of the JAEPS scope, please refer to the Aim&Scope page. For more information about the journal, please refer to the FAQ page or contact info@ewapublishing.org. |
| Aims & scope of JAEPS are: ·Economics ·Management ·Finance & Accounting ·Interdisciplinary Fields |
Article processing charge
A one-time Article Processing Charge (APC) of 450 USD (US Dollars) applies to papers accepted after peer review. excluding taxes.
Open access policy
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. (CC BY 4.0 license).
Your rights
These licenses afford authors copyright while enabling the public to reuse and adapt the content.
Peer-review process
Our blind and multi-reviewer process ensures that all articles are rigorously evaluated based on their intellectual merit and contribution to the field.
Editors View full editorial board
Beijing, China
qin.econpku@gmail.com
London, United Kingdom
Canh.Dang@kcl.ac.uk
Edinburgh, UK
B.Adamolekun@napier.ac.uk
Murcia, Spain
faura@um.es
Latest articles View all articles
Livestream e-commerce enables continuous consumer engagement across the day, yet the role of time-of-day in shaping consumer behavior remains underexplored. This study examines whether shopping during nighttime hours is associated with differences in impulsive engagement, post-purchase outcomes, and consumer retention. Using 982,746 session-level observations from Douyin livestream commerce, we compare consumer behavior during a daytime alertness window (10:00–18:00) and a nighttime low-alertness window (22:00–06:00). Descriptive analyses, Welch’s t-tests, and multivariate regression models are employed to evaluate circadian differences across engagement, sales, return behavior, and retention-related measures. Results show that nighttime livestream sessions generate significantly higher impulsive engagement and sales volume but are associated with lower retention and engagement stability. In contrast, return rates do not increase meaningfully for nighttime purchases once economic and contextual controls are introduced, indicating that heightened impulsivity does not translate into higher regret-driven returns. These findings suggest that time-of-day systematically shapes both short-term commercial performance and longer-term engagement outcomes in livestream commerce. By introducing circadian timing as an explanatory dimension, this study extends applied economic analyses of digital markets and offers implications for platform strategy, performance evaluation, and time-sensitive policy considerations in 24-hour online retail environments.
Time series of financial asset returns typically exhibit pronounced non-ergodicity and heavy-tailed, spiky distributions. Traditional mean–variance models and expectation-based Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) approaches struggle to effectively capture distributional shifts induced by exogenous logical shocks. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a risk-constrained distributional reinforcement learning framework that integrates large language model–based logical reasoning with dynamic graph dependencies (LLM-G-DRL). At the perception level, rather than relying on conventional sentiment polarity classification, this study introduces large language models that support Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) to construct a Bayesian logical belief updating mechanism. This mechanism maps unstructured financial texts into high-dimensional latent logical states embedding causal transmission paths, thereby correcting predictive biases arising from exclusive dependence on historical price and volume data. At the structural level, to characterize the nonlinear contagion of systemic risk, the framework abandons the assumption of static adjacency matrices and employs dynamic graph attention networks (Dynamic GAT) to reconstruct time-varying topological dependencies among assets, enabling explicit modeling of risk propagation channels. At the decision-making level, the portfolio optimization problem is formulated as a Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP). Implicit Quantile Networks (IQN) are adopted to approximate the full probability distribution function while preserving higher-order moment information. Furthermore, based on Lagrangian duality theory, a hard constraint on Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) is introduced, transforming tail-risk control into a dynamic penalty mechanism governed by dual variables. Theoretical analysis demonstrates that, through a closed-loop design combining “logical priors, structural contagion, and distributional decision-making,” the proposed framework exhibits stronger mathematical robustness than traditional point-estimation models. It effectively identifies and avoids tail losses under extreme market conditions, offering a statistically interpretable new paradigm for intelligent asset allocation in non-stationary markets.
This paper develops an operating blueprint for multinational enterprises facing the 15% global minimum tax under Pillar Two. It combines structured analysis of implementation status, Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-up Taxes (QDMTTs), and safe harbours with quantitative assessment of strategic responses across equity chains, business footprint, and substance. A comparative mapping of 48 ± 3 jurisdictions and 72 ± 5 multinational groups shows that by 2026, more than 31.5 ± 4.7 jurisdictions will have implemented some form of Pillar Two, with 19.2 ± 2.9 offering QDMTTs that can offset top-up exposure. Scenario modelling indicates that effective use of transitional country-by-country reporting safe harbours can reduce full GloBE computations from 17.8 ± 5.2 to 6.4 ± 2.1 jurisdictions per group in early years, while coherent QDMTT design and substance reallocation can lower average top-up tax by 23.6 ± 6.3%. The paper proposes a four-dimensional response framework that stabilizes jurisdictional effective tax rates, compresses UTPR exposure, and reduces volatility in quarterly tax charge by 12.7 ± 3.5% in modelled cases. The analysis concludes that Pillar Two should be treated as a multi-year operating programme with tax, finance, and IT jointly accountable for data quality, safe harbour coverage, and strategic alignment.
To systematically study how trendy toy brands trigger and promote consumers' impulsive purchasing behavior, this research takes the phenomenal IP—LABUBU as a case, adopts a cross-platform and multi-source qualitative data collection method, and deeply analyzes consumers' psychological motivations and behavioral performances under multiple dimensions such as emotion, social interaction, and collection. By sorting out user comments, graphic sharing, and media reports on platforms including Xiaohongshu, Zhihu, Douyin, Weibo, and news websites, combined with existing literature theories, this study constructs a comprehensive analytical framework. The research finds that the influencing mechanisms of impulsive consumption induced by trendy toy brands can be mainly summarized into three categories: Design Preference and Emotional Value; Playability and Social Attributes; Collectibility and Global Popularity. Each category of mechanism is supported by specific cases and real consumer feedback. This study not only theoretically reveals the formation path of irrational decision-making in trendy toy consumption behavior and makes up for the lack of empirical research in this field, but also practically provides consumers with reference dimensions to identify and reflect on their own impulsive consumption tendencies, and offers enlightenment for brand owners' marketing strategies and market management. Future research can further extend to the perspectives of corporate marketing strategies and regulatory policies to form a more comprehensive understanding.
Volumes View all volumes
Announcements View all announcements
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
We pledge to our journal community:
We're committed: we put diversity and inclusion at the heart of our activities...
Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies (JAEPS) are solely those of the individual authors and contributors...
Indexing
The published articles will be submitted to following databases below: