Technological progress in the spinning sector of Britain’s cotton industry during the Industrial Revolution and the “Engels’ pause”

Bai Ge

doi:10.54254/2977-5701/2025.22908

Article Information

Received: 7 May 2025

Published: 20 May 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-5701/2025.22908

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Ge,B. (2025). Technological progress in the spinning sector of Britain’s cotton industry during the Industrial Revolution and the “Engels’ pause”. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,18(4),8-16.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: JAEPS Vol.18

Part of Series: Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies

ISSN: 2977-5701 (Print) / 2977-571X (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Engels, F. (1845). Die Lage der arbeitenden Klasse. Leipzig: Otto Wigand.

[2]Allen, R. C. (2009b). Engels’ pause: Technical change, capital accumulation, and inequality in the British industrial revolution. Explorations in Economic History, 46(4), 418-435.

[3]Malthus, T. (2023). An essay on the principle of population. In British Politics and the Environment in the Long Nineteenth Century (pp. 77-84). Routledge.

[4]O’Rourke, K. H., & Williamson, J. G. (2005). From Malthus to Ohlin: Trade, industrialisation and distribution since 1500. Journal of Economic Growth, 10, 5-34.

[5]Marx, K. (2024). Capital: Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1. Princeton University Press.

[6]Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour.

[7]Frey, C. B. (2019). The technology trap: Capital, labor, and power in the age of automation. In The technology trap. Princeton University Press.

[8]Maw, P., Solar, P., Kane, A., & Lyons, J. S. (2022). After the great inventions: Technological change in UK cotton spinning, 1780–1835. The Economic History Review, 75(1), 22-55.

[9]Tertzakian, A. (2022). Wages, employment, and technological change in English cotton spinning, c. 1780-1850.

[10]Fitton, R. S., & Wadsworth, A. P. (1958). The Strutts and the Arkwrights, 1758-1830: A study of the early factory system. Manchester University Press.

[11]Rees, A. (1819). The cyclopaedia; or, Universal dictionary of arts, sciences, and literature. London Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme & Brown.

[12]Crafts, N. F., & Harley, C. K. (1992). Output growth and the British industrial revolution: A restatement of the Crafts-Harley view. Economic History Review, 703-730.

[13]Knight, C. (1860). The English cyclopaedia, a new dictionary of universal knowledge. (Vol. 3). London: Bradbury and Evans.

[14]Baines, E. (1835). History of the cotton manufacture in Great Britain. H. Fisher, R. Fisher, and P. Jackson.

[15]Williams, M., & Farnie, D. A. (1992). Cotton mills in Greater Manchester.

[16]Galbi, D. A. (1997). Child labor and the division of labor in the early English cotton mills. Journal of Population Economics, 10, 357-375.

[17]Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2024). Learning from Ricardo and Thompson: Machinery and Labor in the Early Industrial Revolution, and in the Age of AI.

[18]Factories Inquiry Commission: Supplementary Report of the Central Board of H. Maj. Commissioners Appointed to Collect Information in the Manufacturing Districts, as to the Employment of Children in Factories, and as to the Propriety and Means of Curtailing the Hours of Their Labour; Ordered to be Printed 25 March 1834. (1834).

[19]Great Britain. (1812). An abstract of the evidence lately taken in the House of Commons, against the orders in Council: being a summary of the facts there proved: respecting the present state of the commerce and manufacturers of the country. J. M'Creery.

[20]Wood, G. H. (1910). The History of Wages in the Cotton Trade During the Past Hundred Years (Vol. 30647). Sherratt and Hughes.

[21]Chapman, S. J. (1904). The Lancashire cotton industry: a study in economic development. University Press.

[22]Tertzakian, A. (2025). The Creation of a Gendered Division of Labor in Mule Spinning: Evidence from Samuel Oldknow, 1788–1792. Enterprise & Society, 26(1), 144-169.

[23]Allen, R. C. (2009a). The British industrial revolution in global perspective. Cambridge University Press.

[24]McNeil, I. (2002). An encyclopedia of the history of technology. Routledge.

[25]Freifeld, M. (1986). Technological change and the ‘self‐acting’mule: A study of skill and the sexual division of labour. Social History, 11(3), 319-343.

[26]Takei, Y. (2003). Child and juvenile labour in the English cotton industry. The Shakaikeizaishigaku, 69(4), 435-455.

[27]Oohashi, S. (1953). Guilds and the Apprenticeship System in Late Medieval England. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 4, 28-38.

[28]Yoshida, K. (1979). A Study on the Late 19th-Century British Cotton Industry: Focusing on the Brooklands Agreement. The Journal of the Junior College, Meiji University, 25, 1-25.

[29]Broadberry, S., & Gupta, B. (2005). Cotton textiles and the great divergence: Lancashire, India and shifting competitive advantage, 1600-1850.

[30]Clark, G. (2005). The British Industrial Revolution, 1760-1860. World Economic History, 1-65.

[31]Scott, A. J. (2006). The changing global geography of low-technology, labor-intensive industry: clothing, footwear, and furniture. World Development, 34(9), 1517-1536.

[32]Uni, H. (2015). Transformation of Labor Process and Changes in Fairness Ideals: An Experimental Approach. Japan Society of Political Economy, 52(2), 77-87.